Unqualified?
Gen. Wesley Clark correct that being shot down does not qualify one for the presidency. Just as conducting an air strike campaign over Kosovo does not. Nor does a few years in the Illinois legislature.
Clark’s barb was brainless not so much because it insulted McCain, but because it was a weak criticism in the light of who Clark is supporting. It would be one thing to criticize McCain if his opponent were, say, Dwight Eisenhower. Then one MIGHT be able to argue that McCain’s “executive experience” (by the way, thanks Rudy for that phrase. Now everyone must be held to the standard of being a mayor) was not on par with his opponent. But he’s running against Obama - who has hardly faced the kind of foreign affairs issues that McCain has led on. It’s especially an odd criticism coming from Clark, whose major justification for running for president was his record as a U.S. general - which was not exactly perfect.
So Clark is going to argue McCain lacks experience when he has endorsed Obama, a freshman U.S. Senator? What next - McCain should have spent more time in the run down parts of Phoenix taking on slum lords to have gained better leadership skills? It’s another mindless Washington barb from a politician with an agenda.
Perhaps the knocks against McCain’s age and temper have failed to stick. So Team Obama has moved on to other arguments; his five years in the Hanoi Hilton don’t qualify him, he didn’t lead a large enough squadron, he should have avoided that missile that shot him down, etc.
Expect the barrage to continue. As more try to get a piece of Obama, they will look to do it by digging into McCain. Fortunately those years as a POW that didn’t qualify him to be president strengthened him to handle empty rhetoric.