Remember the John McCain who supposedly didn’t read e-mail or use a computer? Well, suddenly he is Twittering away on his BlackBerry from the Senate floor. Yes, THAT John McCain. The one that then-candidate Obama and the media chided for being “out of touch” with technology. It was always an unfair accusation, given how much of the presidency revolves around decision-making and issues as opposed to what model of BlackBerry one uses.
McCain’s tweets are rather intersting. Sometimes it is about what news show he will appear on. Today it was, “steve nash hurt? amare too! what now for the suns!”
Add rapper Ludacris to the group of people that Barack Obama “didn’t know.” After praising him earlier this year as among “great talents and great businessmen” Obama denounced Ludacris for his song, “Obama is Here.” The video (seen below) kind of speaks for itself.
But really, this is a surprise that Ludacris would offer such astute political analysis? This is the rapper with songs like “Get the F— Back” (lyrics below)
F— That!
Get the f— back!
Luda make your skull crack
Tuck that
B—-, your whole town’s on my n—–k
Cuff that
Put it in your weed, n—-, puff that
What’s that
People gon’ die tonight
Or there is of course “Roll Out:”
Twin glock .40s, cocked back
Me and my homies, so drop that
We rollin on twenties, with the top back
So much money, you can’t stop that
Obama is willing to connect with anyone who serves his interest, but then throw them under the bus when necessary. Ludacris is only talented in a culture where we expect the worst from ourselves. No one with any brains or love of decency should consider themselves one of the “we” that Ludacris is referring to. Racial reconciliation and American identity have far greater models that we should follow. It is tragic that angry, mindless words should be embraced by anyone.
But what do I know, I guess I just be hatin’ on him.
Much has been in the news lately about Chinese hackers who have wreaked havoc on the Pentagon web site and various U.S. government pages.
Apparently Chinese hackers are responsible for a number of attacks on U.S. government sites. But instead of being sponsored by the Chinese government, they operate independently and out of a sense of national pride. To them, hacking into U.S. sites is how they can do their part to take on the American enemy. In addition to the government, corporations, who would be similar targets for attacks, need to get their cybersecurity in order. And this presidential campaign, which has made the Internet a central hub for fundraising and the dissemination of information, makes American web sites a prime target.
The fact that these hackers are acting independently makes them more dangerous, I believe, than if they were Chinese government surrogates. They will likely be more brazen, more willing to take on higher-level targets, and difficult to locate.
The hacking looks like it’s accelerating into a full-fledged cyber war. Recently a few e-Minutemen are taking the fight back to the Chinese. This should be fun to watch. More so than another dry 16 days of Olympics coming soon to Beijing.
An update to a previous post about a Facebook app that lets users interact with the Republican Platform Committee. A site has gone live that lets users post ideas and view the different issues the platform will focus on.
The GOP should get credit for taking advantage of the web and making inroads to those who may be turned off by politics. The Internet continues to change the way people interact to political issues and gives voters a chance to support their cause. Unfortunately, at times this leads to things like a Ron Paul Convention.
The New York Times blasted a Fourth of July bottle rocket straight at Barack Obama: an editorial ripping his recent flip flops on many of the campaign’s top issues. This editorial illuminates the ways in which Obama’s high and idealistic rhetoric has not meshed with his recent policy pronouncements.
He tossed his pledge to campaign within public spending limits. It was back and forth on how soon he would get troops out of Iraq. He sided with the conservative members of the Supreme Court in agreeing with the decision overturning the D.C. handgun ban and opposing the reversal of a Louisiana law making child rapists eligible for the death penalty.
Then there was the cardinal sin of all: agreeing to continue and even expand President Bush’s policy of doling out federal money to faith-based charities.
While some of those views would be welcome to those on the right, it sounds eerily like someone who is a calculating politician trying to maneuver his rhetoric to appeal to the middle. Which is nothing unusual, but the problem is that is not who Obama has claimed he would be. He was supposed to be the “change candidate,” offering a transcendent view of politics and promising to change all the rules.
The problem is such high idealism seldom pans into reality because politics is, well, politics. It does not mean we should cynically assume that all politicians are evil and corrupt. But any who offer to transform politics or offer a generic slogan with the word “change” in it is unlikely to, in all reality, alter things on a messianic level.
Gen. Wesley Clark correct that being shot down does not qualify one for the presidency. Just as conducting an air strike campaign over Kosovo does not. Nor does a few years in the Illinois legislature.
Clark’s barb was brainless not so much because it insulted McCain, but because it was a weak criticism in the light of who Clark is supporting. It would be one thing to criticize McCain if his opponent were, say, Dwight Eisenhower. Then one MIGHT be able to argue that McCain’s “executive experience” (by the way, thanks Rudy for that phrase. Now everyone must be held to the standard of being a mayor) was not on par with his opponent. But he’s running against Obama – who has hardly faced the kind of foreign affairs issues that McCain has led on. It’s especially an odd criticism coming from Clark, whose major justification for running for president was his record as a U.S. general – which was not exactly perfect.
So Clark is going to argue McCain lacks experience when he has endorsed Obama, a freshman U.S. Senator? What next – McCain should have spent more time in the run down parts of Phoenix taking on slum lords to have gained better leadership skills? It’s another mindless Washington barb from a politician with an agenda.
Perhaps the knocks against McCain’s age and temper have failed to stick. So Team Obama has moved on to other arguments; his five years in the Hanoi Hilton don’t qualify him, he didn’t lead a large enough squadron, he should have avoided that missile that shot him down, etc.
Expect the barrage to continue. As more try to get a piece of Obama, they will look to do it by digging into McCain. Fortunately those years as a POW that didn’t qualify him to be president strengthened him to handle empty rhetoric.
